[ragel-users] For very basic XML tokenizing, do I really need Ragel's full scanner functionality?

[Nate]

I posted these links to your SO question:
http://code.google.com/p/libgdx/source/browse/trunk/gdx/src/com/badlogic/gdx/utils/Xml.rl
http://www.badlogicgames.com/wordpress/?p=1712

-Nate


On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Seamus Abshere <seamus at abshere.net> wrote:

> hi,
>
> I've asked this on StackOverflow
>
>
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6274424/for-very-basic-xml-tokenizing-do-i-really-need-ragels-full-scanner-functionalit
>>
>
> In a nutshell, I don't think I need the lookback facility that Ragel's |**|
> provides, but since I'm new to the game, I want to ask for opinions before I
> go down that route.
>
> Thanks!
> Seamus
>
> _______________________________________________
> ragel-users mailing list
> ragel-users at complang.org
> http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.colm.net/pipermail/ragel-users/attachments/20110608/a65d2294/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users at complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users