[ragel-users] [PATCH] Suppress #line output for Ruby code generation

[Adrian Thurston]

Hi David,

Yes this is the right place. Thank you for your submission. The mailing 
list has always been low volume and special purpose lists aren't really 
warranted.

The issue is now tracked in the new redmine instance I've started using 
for my open source projects.

http://www.complang.org/redmine/issues/155

Regards,
  Adrian

On 11-02-03 01:41 PM, David Yip wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Not sure if this is the right place to send patches, but I didn't see
> anything that looked more appropriate on
> http://www.complang.org/ragel/.  (Of course, if I missed it, let me
> know.)
>
> The attached patch contains three changes:
>
> (1) Implementation of the -L option for Ruby code generation by
> suppressing all "# line ..." output.  This isn't the same thing as
> what the C/D code generator does, but IMO is the closest
> interpretation for Ruby code.  The patch is modelled after the
> existing behavior for C/D code generation.
> (2) A change to the option listing to signal Ruby as a target language
> for which -L is available.
> (3) A change that corrects a typo in the option listing ("direcives"
> ->  "directives").
>
> The patch was generated using git diff, but should apply cleanly with
> e.g. GNU patch.
>
> Suggestions and comments welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - David
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ragel-users mailing list
> ragel-users at complang.org
> http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users

_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users at complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users