[ragel-users] Parsing a template language

[Laslavic, Alex]

I'm actually working on a similar sounding task.  

Try the strong subtraction operator
Untested:

main := |*
  '[[' lower+ ']]' => action
  ( any* -- '[[' ) => action
*|;


( any* -- '[[' ) will match the longest possible string that doesn't have '[[' as a substring.

-----Original Message-----
From: ragel-users-bounces at complang.org on behalf of Tobias Lütke
Sent: Tue 7/27/2010 6:54 PM
To: ragel-users at complang.org
Subject: Re: [ragel-users] Parsing a template language
 
Depends on the answers in this thread I suppose :-)



On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Magnus Holm <judofyr at gmail.com> wrote:
> (A little off-topic, but whatever:
>
> So Liquid will finally get a proper parser? :-))
>
> // Magnus Holm
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:15, Tobias Lütke <tobi at leetsoft.com> wrote:
>> I've been working on a parser for simple template language. I'm using Ragel.
>>
>> The requirements are modest. I'm trying to find [[tags]] that can be
>> embedded anywhere in the input string.
>>
>> I'm trying to parse a simple template language, something that can
>> have tags such as {{foo}} embedded within HTML. I tried several
>> approaches to parse this but had to resort to using a Ragel scanner
>> and use the inefficient approach of only matching a single character
>> as a "catch all". I feel this is the wrong way to go about this. I'm
>> essentially abusing the longest-match bias of the scanner to implement
>> my default rule ( it can only be 1 char long, so it should always be
>> the last resort ).
>>
>> %%{
>>
>>  machine parser;
>>
>>  action start      { tokstart = p; }
>>  action on_tag      { results << [:tag, data[tokstart..p]] }
>>  action on_static  { results << [:static, data[p..p]] }
>>
>>  tag  = ('[[' lower+ ']]') >start @on_tag;
>>
>>  main := |*
>>    tag;
>>    any      => on_static;
>>  *|;
>>
>> }%%
>>
>> ( actions written in ruby, but should be easy to understand ).
>>
>> How would you go about writing a parser for such a simple language? Is
>> Ragel maybe not the right tool? It seems you have to fight Ragel tooth
>> and nails if the syntax is unpredictable such as this.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> -- tobi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ragel-users mailing list
>> ragel-users at complang.org
>> http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ragel-users mailing list
> ragel-users at complang.org
> http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
>

_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users at complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.colm.net/pipermail/ragel-users/attachments/20100727/673d0c7a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
ragel-users at complang.org
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users