[ragel-users] more or less solved -- Overfrequent/premature call of 'on-exit-transition' action
Bernie Pallek
berniepallek at brytech.com
Fri Sep 11 21:52:19 UTC 2009
Bernie Pallek wrote:
> <cid:part1.03050701.01060104 at brytech.com>Hello,
>
> We are working on a parser for data blocks, and we've encountered some
> confusion. An action is being taken more frequently than expected (or
> prematurely). We've attached a few files that should be helpful (in
> addition to the original Ragel script). The PNG has been painted on to
> show where the unexpected action (circled in red) is expected to
> appear on the graph (end of red arrow).
> ...
Well, it looks like we've overcome our various problems. In the end, the
most significant consideration was using '%' instead of '@' to trigger
the "processCompleteMessage" action. It's not ideal, because I'd prefer
to call the action after having received the expected number of samples,
as opposed to on transition to the start of the next block. In other
words, if we receive exactly one block's worth of data, we won't process
that block until at least one more byte enters the parser. Any
recommendations on implementing a scheme like that would be appreciated.
(If you hadn't guessed, I've been only been working with Ragel for about
24 hours so far, so I apologize if I'm clogging the list with stupid
questions).
Cheers,
- bernie
More information about the ragel-users
mailing list