[ragel-users] Re: runaway action

[Erich Ocean]

Based on your description, the thread sounds misnamed. Nevertheless, I  
have nothing further to add. Good luck.

Best, Erich

On Aug 11, 2008, at 2:57 PM, Manfred_Nowak wrote:

>
>
>
> On 11 Aug., 19:17, Erich Ocean <er... at atlasocean.com> wrote:
>> Are you examining the dot output?
>
> Yes. The .dot output from ragel is what my first post is based on:
> without any actions the minimal DFA tested okay as executable as well
> as "on paper", i.e. the output of graphviz.
>
> Then, when attributing the `clr' action to the start state, ragel
> split the start state up into two states, from which the inner one got
> all the back edges---only outgoing transitions remained for the start
> state. That's why this thread is titled "runaway action".
>
> -manfred
>
>
> >