[ragel-users] Re: Ruby and Java code generation
Wincent Colaiuta
w... at wincent.com
Sun Sep 30 12:05:11 UTC 2007
El 28/9/2007, a las 22:04, Adrian Thurston escribió:
> Before loop breaks and variables were used in Ruby code call/cc
> features
> were used. This was found to be very slow (about 10 times slower than
> the current). Do you think throw/catch would be any better than
> call/cc?
Yes, if for no other reason than the fact that Ruby 1.9 won't have
call/cc...
Cheers,
Wincent
More information about the ragel-users
mailing list