[ragel-users] Re: ragel 5.23 released

[Adrian Thurston]

Steve Horne wrote:
> First, any chance of a new built-in machine? - one that never matches
> anything? The idea is to use it in placeholder rules, that will be
> filled in later - options that aren't implemented yet.

I don't understand this, filled in at what time? Could you please be
specific in terms of the compilation of a Ragel program.

> class classname
> {
>   static const int membername;
> };
> ...
> static const int classname::membername = 5;

Is there a particular reason to want table data in a class? I can
imagine wanting variables that identify states (such as start_state) in
the class, but I can't see a reason to want table data.

-Adrian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.colm.net/pipermail/ragel-users/attachments/20070801/920dd434/attachment-0001.sig>